*T*that includes linear arithmetic, sets, tuples, and maps. For symbolic analysis, ASMs are translated into guarded update systems called model programs. We formulate the problem of bounded path exploration of model programs, or the problem of Bounded Model Program Checking (BMPC) as a satis.ability problem modulo

*T*. Then we investigate the boundaries of decidable and undecidable cases for BMPC. In a general setting, BMPC is shown to be highly undecidable (Σ

_{1}

^{1}-complete); and even when restricting to .nite sets the problem remains re-hard (Σ

^{0}

_{1}-hard). On the other hand, BMPC is shown to be decidable for a class of basic model programs that are common in practice. We use Satis.ability Modulo Theories (SMT) for solving BMPC; an instance of the BMPC problem is mapped to a formula, the formula is satis.able modulo

*T*if and only if the corresponding BMPC problem instance has a solution. The recent SMT advances allow us to directly analyze speci.cations using sets and maps with specialized decision procedures for expressive fragments of these theories. Our approach is extensible; background theories need in fact only be partially solved by the SMT solver; we use simulation of ASMs to support additional theories that are beyond the scope of available decision procedures.